|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Dave Stark
4552
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 18:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
31 pages? damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.
people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?
if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it". |

Dave Stark
4560
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 18:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Dave Stark wrote:31 pages? damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.
people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?
if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it". And then carry the charade on for personal pleasure and ego-stroking. I don't see how you can realistically justify the extent of the situation they put this guy through. The rest of it was purely for enjoyment. Some people find that objectionable.
most enjoyment in this game is derived from ruining some one's day. the difference is, this guy could close TS whenever he wanted.
hell, it was easier for him to remove himself from this situation than it is to safely log out of eve. |

Dave Stark
4560
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 18:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Dave Stark wrote:31 pages? damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.
people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?
if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it". The mob demands blood
i agree, that guy was completely racist and verbally abusive. he's not the type of player we want in this game. |

Dave Stark
4560
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 18:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Jayem See wrote:Dave Stark wrote:31 pages? damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.
people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?
if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it". And then carry the charade on for personal pleasure and ego-stroking. I don't see how you can realistically justify the extent of the situation they put this guy through. The rest of it was purely for enjoyment. Some people find that objectionable. most enjoyment in this game is derived from ruining some one's day. the difference is, this guy could close TS whenever he wanted. hell, it was easier for him to remove himself from this situation than it is to safely log out of eve. You discount the level of emotional attachment that was involved after a while. I am not defending the person that was scammed here at all. That someone is gullible and perhaps not that smart is not reason to prolong the situation for as long as it went on. That's my concern. The length of time that this went on is slightly disturbing to a number of people.
then he should have removed himself from the situation. |

Dave Stark
4570
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 18:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave Stark wrote:then he should have removed himself from the situation. "When the bullies harass you, go find a teacher." that's terrible advice. if you're a child being bullied, kick the kid in the knackers and make sure you're out of there by the time he gets up again. |

Dave Stark
4570
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 18:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ravcharas wrote:Dave Stark wrote: most enjoyment in this game is derived from ruining some one's day. the difference is, this guy could close TS whenever he wanted.
hell, it was easier for him to remove himself from this situation than it is to safely log out of eve.
You know who else could have closed TS? Erotica 1. But I guess once someone logs onto your comms you're obliged to torment him until he snaps.
congratulations, you've realised how easy it is to close TS. such a shame the "victim" wasn't as enlightened as you. |

Dave Stark
4570
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Quote:then he should have removed himself from the situation I agree - but you have to remember some people don't react how you and I might. I think it was taken too far - a lot of people seem to feel the same.
a person thinks homosexuals are an abomination and shouldn't exist - a lot of people seem to feel the same.
a lot of people feeling the same doesn't make them correct, or worthy of acknowledgement. |

Dave Stark
4570
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Jayem See wrote:Dave Stark wrote:31 pages? damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.
people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?
if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it". And then carry the charade on for personal pleasure and ego-stroking. I don't see how you can realistically justify the extent of the situation they put this guy through. The rest of it was purely for enjoyment. Some people find that objectionable. most enjoyment in this game is derived from ruining some one's day. the difference is, this guy could close TS whenever he wanted. hell, it was easier for him to remove himself from this situation than it is to safely log out of eve. I see this excuse repeated over and over. The problem with it is that when you steal candy from a baby or trick the elderly, weak minded, or foolish to give you their rent money, you're still an asshat. Moreover, in my mind, your conduct is more reprehensible because you took advantage of people who, for what ever reason, are mentally infirm, weak and incapable of adequately defending themselves. Sure E1's victim could have gotten up and left - the fact that he stayed showed his mental infirmities, and it is playing off those infirmities that makes E1's action so obscene.
i don't remember saying erotica isn't an asshat.
which part of the "show info" tab on a pilot indicates that the pilot is mentally unstable, vulnerable, and/or in anyway incapable of functioning as a normal human being. then i'll agree that the fault lies undoubtedly with ero.
if the victim was indeed mentally unstable, vulnerable, and/or in any way capable of functioning as a normal human being then the people providing care for him have failed their duty and are the ones who are ultimately responsible for this hour and a half of "torture" (and quite frankly i think ripard is scum for trivialising torture like this) |

Dave Stark
4573
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Jayem See wrote:Quote:then he should have removed himself from the situation I agree - but you have to remember some people don't react how you and I might. I think it was taken too far - a lot of people seem to feel the same. a person thinks homosexuals are an abomination and shouldn't exist - a lot of people seem to feel the same. a lot of people feeling the same doesn't make them correct, or worthy of acknowledgement. A lot of people didn't have an issue with slavery. Some did. Some people took notice of that. I don't really want to be drawn into real life examples as it achieves nothing. Simply to say people's opinions are worthless because you disagree with them is....shortsighted.
then i suggest you stay away from irrelevant anecdotes and stick to the facts of the situation.
the fact of the situation is as follows; he was one keystroke from removing himself from the situation and turning a 1.5 hour teamspeak session in to a non-event. |

Dave Stark
4573
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Jayem See wrote:Quote:then he should have removed himself from the situation I agree - but you have to remember some people don't react how you and I might. I think it was taken too far - a lot of people seem to feel the same. a person thinks homosexuals are an abomination and shouldn't exist - a lot of people seem to feel the same. a lot of people feeling the same doesn't make them correct, or worthy of acknowledgement. By the same logic, a lot of people believe in gay rights, sexual equality and racial equality; doesn't make them wrong either.
exactly it's a ****** logic and we should stick to discussing the facts of the situation. |
|

Dave Stark
4573
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meilandra Vanderganken wrote:Well yeah, I think he goes way over the line of decent behavior. Having said that: how bloody stupid do you have to be to engage in his bonus room thingy?
general consensus so far is: bordering on mental instability. |

Dave Stark
4577
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave Stark wrote:the fact of the situation is as follows; he was one keystroke from removing himself from the situation and turning a 1.5 hour teamspeak session in to a non-event. Do you attribute this to his lack of awareness or Erotica1's skill at manipulation? "Shouldn't have worn that dress"
no. |

Dave Stark
4577
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Meilandra Vanderganken wrote:Well yeah, I think he goes way over the line of decent behavior. Having said that: how bloody stupid do you have to be to engage in his bonus room thingy?
general consensus so far is: bordering on mental instability. Yes, which is part of the mechanic of selection of victims for extortion/ransom used in this OUT OF GAME activity.
where does that show up on the show info tab on a pilot's information? pray tell. |

Dave Stark
4577
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
completely misread that. |

Dave Stark
4577
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
Timmy Sprinkles wrote:Perhaps CCP could add IP addresses linked to peoples accounts in game and in the forums. Out of Game Justice should balance the books.
yes, let's promote out of game violence.
you do realise that makes you worse than the problem being discussed, right? |

Dave Stark
4577
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave Stark wrote:the fact of the situation is as follows; he was one keystroke from removing himself from the situation and turning a 1.5 hour teamspeak session in to a non-event. Do you attribute this to his lack of awareness or Erotica1's skill at manipulation? "Shouldn't have worn that dress" Your words. Some guy getting embarrassed because he's greedy is in no way comparable to sexual assault. Just like getting made fun of on the internet is not the same as torture (DIAF ripard), and getting scammed is not cyberbullying.
you know, it totally passed me by that he was referencing sexual assault there.
so we've had a torture, and sexual assault comparison. any bets on the next dumb comparison? |

Dave Stark
4577
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Timmy Sprinkles wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Timmy Sprinkles wrote:Perhaps CCP could add IP addresses linked to peoples accounts in game and in the forums. Out of Game Justice should balance the books. yes, let's promote out of game violence. you do realise that makes you worse than the problem being discussed, right? Based on the other things going on out of game promoting bullying, it would be no different.
i'm sorry was that a justification of promoting real life violence? because if it was, that was terrible. if it wasn't then; what the hell are you talking about? |

Dave Stark
4587
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:28:00 -
[18] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Wow...37 pages and counting.
This would be a good spot for a TLDR of the thread so far, anyone?
dumb person did something dumb, some one took advantage of it. average day in life, and eve, really.
not really much of a story but that's the tl;dr. |

Dave Stark
4600
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Emma Muutaras wrote:
personally i would advice the victim to make a official complaint to his/her local police.
Which one? The caller and the host both are at fault, according to this trial by forum
hi is that the police? some guy stole my internet spaceships so i threw racist slurs at them and threatened them.
pretty sure we know how that will go. |

Dave Stark
4608
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Erotica 1 wrote:Big Lynx wrote:Again: how much isk was scammed out of that guy? Client lost around 1b total when he failed the bonus round. So we understand correctly... Client willingly participated in demeaning acts done upon him. Client paid equivalent of approx $29 USD in ISK/assets, which divided by 2 hours equals $7.25 per half hour. A quick search for S&M dominatrices (not related to the Dominix) in my area quotes S&M services at $140 per half hour. The client owes Erotica1 for the difference IMHO. F
i'm going to assume it was a quick search because you knew exactly where to find such services? ;) |
|

Dave Stark
4609
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:If bloggers didn't pick the bonus room up, it wouldn't even be widely distributed.
and people still wouldn't care. |

Dave Stark
4609
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 20:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Batelle wrote:Your words. Some guy getting embarrassed because he's greedy is in no way comparable to sexual assault. I wasn't comparing it to sexual assault. I was comparing his rationalization to the rationalizations for sexual assault. Then allow me to be fully serious here. Blaming the victim in RL sexual violence = not okay, and such rationalization is in and of itself morally reprehensible since the rationalization itself does measurable harm to real people who are or are yet to be victims of sexual assault. Blaming the victim in RL for other crimes = you blame the victim where appropriate given the circumstances and blame the criminal always. Blaming the victim in Eve scam = okay. Eve is a dangerous place and assumed to be dangerous, and since we can't blame the eve-criminal for valid gameplay, we can certainly blame the victim for being stupid and greedy. If the criminal does morally reprehensible things (like manipulating and taunting the disabled), then we consider and judge that separately from the scam. It may make the victim seem more sympathetic, but it doesn't make him any less stupid and greedy. Blaming the victim isn't the same as absolving the criminal. Its just that in Eve we tend to hold the criminal blameless by default, because its much more fun that way.
we don't even need to blame the victim, we just need to point out that this situation simply didn't need to happen if the "victim" didn't want it to happen as he was one keystroke from the situation not existing. |

Dave Stark
4609
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 20:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Next we shall blog about the reading of Erotic Fan Fiction over mumble while structure bashing and how its killing Eve!
this type of smut must be stamped out! |

Dave Stark
4615
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:07:00 -
[24] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Cultural Enrichment wrote:Allow me to reiterate on the reality of cyber bullying: Quote:Hahahahahahahaha How The **** Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha ***** Just Walk Away From The Screen Like ***** Close Your Eyes Haha And let me point out that getting someone to sing and record it is not cyber bullying. Cyber bullying or any bullying is something that happens over months/years and is a constant bombardment of hate.
and usually where the victim is unable to remove themselves from the situation with the click of one mouse button. |

Dave Stark
4615
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:10:00 -
[25] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:Sirinda wrote:I am appaled at what he's doing, but I also get Malcanis' point of view, if it is the one I think it is.
Basically, you can't punish somebody who hasn't broken any rules, and doing so in spite of it would create a dangerous precedent. In that regard, CCP's hands are more or less tied unless they want to invoke their TOS' arbitrary savior clause.
What a lot of people on the pages 1-5 are apparently forgetting is the fact CCP created those rules; there is no reason they couldn't adapt them to the situation. Failure to do so would border on criminal negligence, IMHO. Ive said it multiple times to multiple people in this thread. The Mittani + Fan fest. It happened, he broke no rules, yet he got a temp ban and was forced from his position. That was the right thing to do in that situation, its also my opinion that Erotica should have all his assets/isk removed and also receive a ban, but i have morals so i guess im in the minority.
the difference is, the mittani told people to add him and made comments about the guy possibly committing suicide. that's vastly different to what happened here. |

Dave Stark
4615
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Don Aubaris wrote:Seems some people don't understand how much 1 billion is. If you only have 1 billion in assets you probably worked for it in Eve. That's not $20 but hours and hours and hours in gameplay. The emotional tie to that is alot stronger then with someone who just buys a PLEX and sells it. I can understand that guy trying to get that back. He is not gonna make the bill and say 'oh well I can buy it all back tomorrow' I can understand him exploding and crossing a line. Not that this is a smart or acceptable thing to do.
I do not understand the 'fun' one gets out of pushing someone to his breaking point.
Anyway..this thread tells me I have to call my parents tomorrow. Thank them thousand times for giving me a decent upbringing with a moral compass.
it's about 8 hours of someone's time, yes he could buy it all back tomorrow. |

Dave Stark
4615
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:14:00 -
[27] - Quote
Gogela wrote:I find all of this thoroughly entertaining. I can tell a lot of people haven't listened to the whole audio file. The end is the best part! 
you mean when the poor ikkle victim starts spewing racism and real life threats? i gotta admit, i lol'd at that. |

Dave Stark
4621
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Gogela wrote:I find all of this thoroughly entertaining. I can tell a lot of people haven't listened to the whole audio file. The end is the best part!  you mean when the poor ikkle victim starts spewing racism and real life threats? i gotta admit, i lol'd at that. The end of the audio is just fantastic. I listened to it 3 times. My wife just lawled.
not sure that was the response jester predicted, but cool. |

Dave Stark
4624
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:Gogela wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Gogela wrote:I find all of this thoroughly entertaining. I can tell a lot of people haven't listened to the whole audio file. The end is the best part!  you mean when the poor ikkle victim starts spewing racism and real life threats? i gotta admit, i lol'd at that. Well... yah exactly? Erotica 1's actions are "debateable" at best. That 'victim's' reaction was a clear EULA violation. If you really wanted to come down to brass tacks, that guy would be banned. Because of the circumstances it's being overlooked, but if you press on the rules, if you are even talking/writing about having having Erotica 1 banned, than you would absolutely have to ban the victim here. It's crystal clear to me... Much as I hate to break your little trollish bubble, but as has been noted many times by those coming to E1's defence, said verbal outburst by the victim happened OUTSIDE Eve. Therefore no EULA violation. You can't have it both ways...
but that's kinda the point; those calling for ero's ban because "it did breach the eula/tos/whatever" even though it was outside of the game seem to overlook that in that full recording, nothing ero said or did was worse than the amount of profanity, racism, and real life threats that erupted forth from the "victim" in the space of about 60 seconds towards the end of the recording which is far more ban worthy. |

Dave Stark
4624
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:32:00 -
[30] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Xander Delacroix wrote:
Much as I hate to break your little trollish bubble, but as has been noted many times by those coming to E1's defence, said verbal outburst by the victim happened OUTSIDE Eve. Therefore no EULA violation. You can't have it both ways...
No you cant. Either they are both punished, or neither is. Or CCP takes it as a wake-up call to modify the TOS/EULA. Mr Epeen  This. So much this.
i must be missing something, what needs to be changed? |
|

Dave Stark
4624
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i must be missing something, what needs to be changed? Yes, very clearly you are. Bless.
clearly since you went to the sarcastic insults rather than an actual answer, there's nothing that needs to be changed.
thanks for clearing that up. |

Dave Stark
4635
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:I was half expecting this thread to be locked by now.
Then a "do not talk about this again or you'll get banned" warning from CCP *Insert name here*
i think this thread is a great way to judge how many people would love themepark eve vs those of us that came explicitly not to be handheld. |

Dave Stark
4635
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:I was half expecting this thread to be locked by now.
Then a "do not talk about this again or you'll get banned" warning from CCP *Insert name here* i think this thread is a great way to judge how many people would love themepark eve vs those of us that came explicitly not to be handheld. Dave you can hold my hand any time. I may even let you wear Kimmi's cosy.  Love you too, Mag's. |

Dave Stark
4635
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Big Lynx wrote:Threadnaught is longer now
yeah things tend to get longer when i get excited. |

Dave Stark
4635
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:44:00 -
[35] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:The ultimate payout might be a roundhouse kick to the face from some random aggrieved loony at Fanfest.
just going to point out that you've confirmed your stance that running a scam in a game that encourages scams, is to you, less acceptable than physical violence. |

Dave Stark
4641
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Hey look, a psychopath sadist talks about civility. So Erotica tell me, hows it going? You humiliated any more vulnerable people today, maybe made one or two cry? You would like that wouldnt you.
show us on the doll which bonus room you were scammed in. |

Dave Stark
4641
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 21:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
Muestereate wrote:Why do we have to play on a fair playing field all of a sudden by punishing the victim? Equality among people doesn't even exist. How can that be seen as an important value in this case?
because rules should be enforced equally, not just on people you don't like. that's why we have to have a fair playing field, especially when they're both paying customers.
although if we're not going to apply rules equally, i'd be fine with banning the racist. |

Dave Stark
4644
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:just going to point out that you've confirmed your stance that running a scam in a game that encourages scams, is to you, less acceptable than physical violence. I would laugh and applaud if someone kicked Erotica1 in the face at a Fanfest. Nothing illegal about laughing or applauding, nor is it against EULA. I would also laugh and applaud if Erotica1 was banned from the game. Again, nothing illegal about laughing or applauding, nor is it against EULA. Wouldn't you?
no, i'd have the person A) arrested for assault, and B) sectioned for not understanding the difference between a game, and real life. |

Dave Stark
4649
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:08:00 -
[39] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So.... if its not against the EULA of a video game, its ok in real life huh? Read you, daft cow. Notice the phrase "its not illegal". So yes, it is ok in real life.
i'm 100% sure that kicking some one in the face, is not legal. it's assault. |

Dave Stark
4649
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave Stark wrote:we've gone from breaking the eula in an irrelevant spaceship game A lot of posting from you for something irrelevant, wouldn't you agree?
sorry what? if you'd like to make sense, that'd be great. |
|

Dave Stark
4649
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i'm 100% sure that kicking some one in the face, is not legal. it's assault. Laughing and applauding it is not illegal. Which is what I said. Reading is HAAARRD.
so what you're telling me is that you'd take great joy in some one else's misfortune of being kicked in the face.
the very thing you're demonising erotica for?
c'mon buddy, stop being a hypocrite. |

Dave Stark
4649
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave: This is an irrelevant spaceship game. Dave: Pardon me while I make 30 important posts about it.
Clear enough now?
other than in this game, this game is relevant nowhere.
in the context of this discussion, it's an irrelevant spaceship game that generally the world doesn't give two ***** about vs laws that everyone must follow.
context is important, you should understand it before posting. |

Dave Stark
4649
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:I am not causing anyone misfortune by laughing or applauding. The same cannot be said of Erotica1. Nice try though!
so why aren't you laughing at the racist who was robbed of 1bn isk of assets? clearly you should be, apparently that's what makes you happy.
you're the biggest hypocrite in this thread, and people like you are undermining any shred of credible argument being put forward by the witch-hunters. |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:So.... if its not against the EULA of a video game, its ok in real life huh? Read you, daft cow. Notice the phrase "its not illegal". So yes, it is ok in real life. i'm 100% sure that kicking some one in the face, is not legal. it's assault. He did state he would not kick, he just stated he would laugh. You are allowed to laugh, you're even encouraged to laugh irl. Bad reading is however frowned upon, both in real life as on the internet.
so if we're all allowed to laugh at these events, why are people demonising erotica? |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:17:00 -
[45] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave: This is an irrelevant spaceship game. Dave: Pardon me while I make 30 important posts about it.
Clear enough now? Cant speak for Dave but we are well known for our love for posting.
sometimes i do, sometimes i don't.
i fall in and out of love with it, along with the occasional CCP advised vacations. |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:Getting someone to sing on comms is nowhere near the same thing. I dont hear anyone singing gleefully in that recording. I hear a group of sadists circlejerking with sweaty palms amidst much heavy breathing at the suffering they can inflict on a person outside of the game.
guess you didn't get to the end where the "victim" broke out in to a tirade of racial slurs and real life threats, then? |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:21:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jacabon Mere wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:Getting someone to sing on comms is nowhere near the same thing. I dont hear anyone singing gleefully in that recording. I hear a group of sadists circlejerking with sweaty palms amidst much heavy breathing at the suffering they can inflict on a person outside of the game. guess you didn't get to the end where the "victim" broke out in to a tirade of racial slurs and real life threats, then? The guy snapped after 2 hours of psychological torture. What he says at that point is really irrelevant.
no it's not, it's very relevant. he said things more abhorrent than any other person in that recording. |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:22:00 -
[48] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:I like how Dave Stark tried to derail the thread, to keep it on topic.
i'm glad my work doesn't go unappreciated. |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:23:00 -
[49] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:Dave Stark wrote:why are people demonising erotica? Ride that white horse Dave. Be the hero Erotica1 needs and deserves.
i'm not defending ero at all, but people saying they'd take great joy in the very thing they're demonising him for is very hypocritical of them. |

Dave Stark
4664
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:25:00 -
[50] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:In these recordings, Erotica and Co. is the one doing the kicking. You are however still allowed to laugh.
if that's the case then is the "victim" stabbing erotica since his part in all of this is worse than ero's. ero's part is very tame in comparison to the tirade of racial slurs and real life threats from the guy that hypothetically got kicked in the face. |
|

Dave Stark
4671
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:34:00 -
[51] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:baltec1 wrote:Csill Es wrote:CCP has an unique opportunity to distance themselves from these bottom feeders - Erotica1 and cohorts -, but only if they act fast. If they do anything to Erotica then they will also have to take action against this "victim" as what they said was far worse. No. They really don't have to do anything they don't want. They make the rules, not you. Mr Epeen 
they do make the rules, people are fine with that.
when they pick and choose when they do and don't want to enforce the rules, and do it in a fashion that exempts certain people... that's going to cause upset.
rules are applied to everyone, that's the point of rules, to ensure everyone is on a level playing field. |

Dave Stark
4678
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:35:00 -
[52] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Mag's wrote:Actually you can, it's an incite to riot and public order offence. Laughing and applauding is outlawed in your country? Thats fked up, dude.
still less ****** up than wanting some one to get kicked in the face, dude. |

Dave Stark
4678
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:37:00 -
[53] - Quote
arabella blood wrote:Dave Stark wrote: i'm not defending ero at all,
Said the guy who used (and probably still) to sit in the "bonus room" right there with E1.
still ass hurt about reading half of something i typed in the lounge, then blocking me before i finished my sentence i see.
good for you arabella. |

Dave Stark
4678
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
Kadl wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i'm not defending ero at all, but people saying they'd take great joy in the very thing they're demonising him for [actually, something worse than what they're demonising him for] is very hypocritical of them. So are you willing to say anything against Erotica1's behavior in the audio?
you mean the standard behaviour of erotica that has been happening for a long time, that nobody has given a **** about until ripard get started a witch hunt on his blog?
sure i'll say something about it; it was far more acceptable than the racism and threats from the "victim". when it comes down to it, i'll gladly take erotica's [arguably over zealous] scamming, over that guy's racism and threats any day of the week. |

Dave Stark
4678
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
arabella blood wrote:Dave Stark wrote:arabella blood wrote:Dave Stark wrote: i'm not defending ero at all,
Said the guy who used (and probably still) to sit in the "bonus room" right there with E1. still ass hurt about reading half of something i typed in the lounge, then blocking me before i finished my sentence i see. good for you arabella. So you are not part of it? were not sitting in this room from the "scamming" side?
was i in the bonus room linked in ripard's blog? no.
have i been in a bonus room? yes, but not many.
have i been in a bonus room for the full duration? no.
have i actively participated in a bonus room and goaded contestants? no, i don't speak on teamspeak. believe it or not, i'm very shy on voice comms. too many americans to be comfortable with my british accent.
any other questions you need answering? |

Dave Stark
4684
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:Dave Stark wrote:handige harrie wrote:In these recordings, Erotica and Co. is the one doing the kicking. You are however still allowed to laugh. if that's the case then is the "victim" stabbing erotica since his part in all of this is worse than ero's. ero's part is very tame in comparison to the tirade of racial slurs and real life threats from the guy that hypothetically got kicked in the face. Behaviours envokes reaction. Be bad (or good) to someone and you can expect a reaction which is often not thought out in the 'heat of the moment'. Although I agree he choice of words is rather awkward. But it sounds like a 'fight or flight' reaction after the realisation he got himself in a huge mess ingame as well as out of game, I don't think he gave the value of his words the same amount of thought as Erotica and Co did to their own words, when they came up with the idea on how to push people over the edge.
that's not an excuse for being racist, it just isn't. there's no excuse for that. |

Dave Stark
4684
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dave Stark wrote:british accent.
any other questions you need answering? YEah. Whats a British accent sound like? Is it like an English Welsh Scots or Northern Irish one? And which part of those places does it sound most like the accent of? 
personally, i have a brummie accent. |

Dave Stark
4684
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:49:00 -
[58] - Quote
Kadl wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kadl wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i'm not defending ero at all, but people saying they'd take great joy in the very thing they're demonising him for [actually, something worse than what they're demonising him for] is very hypocritical of them. So are you willing to say anything against Erotica1's behavior in the audio? you mean the standard behaviour of erotica that has been happening for a long time, that nobody has given a **** about until ripard get started a witch hunt on his blog? sure i'll say something about it; it was far more acceptable than the racism and threats from the "victim". when it comes down to it, i'll gladly take erotica's [arguably over zealous] scamming, over that guy's racism and threats any day of the week. So you find it acceptable to actively attempt to humiliate people and cause them pain (outside of any games)?
i don't find it unacceptable, i'm petty indifferent to it when the situation is such that any humiliation and pain can be avoided with one click of a mouse at any time the "victim" chooses. |

Dave Stark
4684
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:It is if you are laughing and applauding at someone being attacked on the street. If its someone who I know has spent 2hrs tormenting a victim and his wife to the point of breaking, for no other reason than to sadistically enjoy their suffering and to share their recording of it with "friends", yes, I will absolutely laugh and applaud. Salvos, you're really not helping yourself here... Mags, Baltec, Dave, Jenn et al: Stop the broken record already! We know that the victim used some bad words and slurs when, after two hours of torment, he finally snapped (losing his composure, temper and possible a few marbles). Does that make his use of said words excusable? No. Does it make his stream of invective understandable? Yes. Let's move on shall we? The words the victim used, or the threats, empty or otherwise, made towards E1 were made after 2 hours of systematic psychological and emotional abuse. Yes, they were bad words. We get it. Really.
then stop pretending that erotica is the biggest monster in the story when he did very little in comparison. |

Dave Stark
4684
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Mag's wrote:In the area I live in (Robin Hood land) we hear such colloquialisms as 'ayup me duck' and 'nowt wrong we that' Dave Stark wrote:personally, i have a brummie accent. Bloody northerners. 
i'm not northern, it's the midlands for a reason. |
|

Dave Stark
4684
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:53:00 -
[61] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:
At what point in the recording does the victim sing?
Are you now trying to say that they were not trying to get this person to sing? Did I say that? *Looks at quote* Nope.
you're either implying that they didn't get him to sing, or that you didn't listen to the recording.
otherwise, you'd know the answer to that question. |

Dave Stark
4693
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:55:00 -
[62] - Quote
handige harrie wrote:Except all his hours of work also dissapear with that click, while they keep up appearances that he can get it back if he continues in the masquarade.
it was 1bn isk, it was 8 hours of in game grinding, or about an hour or less of overtime at work.
as far as scams go, this was about as newsworthy as "man goes to work on monday morning".
as far as lessons go in eve, this was a relatively cheap and quick one. i've lost more isk and taken more time to learn things about eve than this guy lost and learned in 1 bonus room. |

Dave Stark
4693
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:56:00 -
[63] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Dave Stark wrote:admiral root wrote:Mag's wrote:In the area I live in (Robin Hood land) we hear such colloquialisms as 'ayup me duck' and 'nowt wrong we that' Dave Stark wrote:personally, i have a brummie accent. Bloody northerners.  i'm not northern, it's the midlands for a reason. That's what I said - up north. :P
i lived on the south coast for 4 years if that counts? |

Dave Stark
4693
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 22:59:00 -
[64] - Quote
Xander Delacroix wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Xander Delacroix wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:It is if you are laughing and applauding at someone being attacked on the street. If its someone who I know has spent 2hrs tormenting a victim and his wife to the point of breaking, for no other reason than to sadistically enjoy their suffering and to share their recording of it with "friends", yes, I will absolutely laugh and applaud. Salvos, you're really not helping yourself here... Mags, Baltec, Dave, Jenn et al: Stop the broken record already! We know that the victim used some bad words and slurs when, after two hours of torment, he finally snapped (losing his composure, temper and possible a few marbles). Does that make his use of said words excusable? No. Does it make his stream of invective understandable? Yes. Let's move on shall we? The words the victim used, or the threats, empty or otherwise, made towards E1 were made after 2 hours of systematic psychological and emotional abuse. Yes, they were bad words. We get it. Really. then stop pretending that erotica is the biggest monster in the story when he did very little in comparison. "Very little in comparison"?! You seriously just said that? Did you miss the part about the two hours of systematic psychological and emotional abuse? Oh yes, of course you did.
you mean the 2 hours that the "victim" willingly participated in, prior to unleashing a barrage of abhorrent abuse? |

Dave Stark
4693
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:00:00 -
[65] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i lived on the south coast for 4 years if that counts? Well, I supposeso . Plus, you usually post good stuff on here. Ok, you can go on the list of people who are alright. 
success! |

Dave Stark
4705
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:05:00 -
[66] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i lived on the south coast for 4 years if that counts? It just means you were a soft southern sh*te for 4 years. 
haha, i do love you mag's.
arabella blood wrote:Yes. What is the full duration? is it until you broke the victim to tears? is it until he quits? is it until he 'wins'? is it 2 hours every time?
And also, were you on the 'scamming' side? or you just happen to jump into a room, not saying word, just sitting there listening to people sing song and humiliate themselves?
no idea, never stuck around that long. if i'm brutally honest having some one singing ****** songs in ****** quality over teamspeak doesn't entertain me all that much, not to mention due to timezones most of them are at unfavourable times for me to stay the whole duration even if i were so inclined.
I was aware of the bonus room through erotica etc, not the "victim". pretty much, i'd just sit and take up a slot in TS and listen in while i was ship spinning, or sending emails, or generally just doing internet things. then undoubtedly i'd mute it, or disconnect and put spotify/netflix back on. |

Dave Stark
4705
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:07:00 -
[67] - Quote
Kirsi Kirjasto wrote:Actually, the REALLY scary bit?
That Sohkar is supposedly a FRIGGEN Air Traffic Controller. I will express myself in Chinese.
Ho Lee Fuk.
Seriously, I think CCP, having his 'real life' information - should report Sohkar to the proper authorities.
Somebody this obviously unstable and insane should NOT be directing aircraft in ANY capacity.
Erotica 1 actually did us a great service by exposing a clear and present risk to public safety.
Would YOU feel comfortable landing at a busy airport staffed by someone like Sohkar?
guess now we know what happened to that malaysian aircraft. |

Dave Stark
4705
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:07:00 -
[68] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Takes one to know one.
um, no it doesn't. |

Dave Stark
4705
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:12:00 -
[69] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Saw it coming 
can i make a "that's what she said" joke?
because, that's what she said. |

Dave Stark
4705
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:13:00 -
[70] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kadl wrote:If this or any similar acts becomes a major news story CCP is going to have problems. The headline "Cyberbullying in EVE" will create unwanted attention. As a business, CCP should consider the situation and act so as to protect their profits and the game.
Personally I would like to see more sportsmanship in EVE. I think that would be a good use of CCP's efforts. Already sent the tip to CNN, BBC, Guardian, and couple of other news sites I read. Someone is bound to pick this up. Spread the word! Force CCP to act! They are going to get a racist shouting at other people. You honestly expect the Beeb to take his side?
i hear the beeb aren't going to have enough funding to publish the story, even if they wanted to. |
|

Dave Stark
4708
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:17:00 -
[71] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:baltec1 wrote:Saw it coming  can i make a "that's what she said" joke? because, that's what she said. Pff, you should go with the whole FOX News, "goons are a CIA front" angle and pointed out that I said I "saw it coming" 
it's late, i can't come up with ideas that good when i should be getting ready for bed.
i should also be having tomorrow off but, c'est la vie. |

Dave Stark
4708
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:19:00 -
[72] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Kadl wrote:If this or any similar acts becomes a major news story CCP is going to have problems. The headline "Cyberbullying in EVE" will create unwanted attention. As a business, CCP should consider the situation and act so as to protect their profits and the game.
Personally I would like to see more sportsmanship in EVE. I think that would be a good use of CCP's efforts. Already sent the tip to CNN, BBC, Guardian, and couple of other news sites I read. Someone is bound to pick this up. Spread the word! Force CCP to act! They are going to get a racist shouting at other people. You honestly expect the Beeb to take his side? Doesn't matter whose side they take. What matters is they will say EVE allows and tolerates this kind of thing - and thats a BIG negative for CCP right there. It might attract a few dozen sadists to the game, but it will turn off a lot more normal guys. The idea is for CCP to be forced into preventative measures - such as, I dont know, booting E1, his alts, his friends? That would be appropriate. Better then high school justice at fanfest, and probably more effective then cancelling subscriptions by regular people.
"eve tolerates abuse on unrelated third party voice communications they have no control of"
i'm sure the outcry will be deafening.
|

Dave Stark
4714
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:As harsh as it may sound, scamming is a part of Eve.
However, the major problem I have is where they make fun of his speech impediment. There is no acceptable excuse CCP can give, that should allow this behavior.
This is bullying.
CCP should not tolerate this, and I'm quiet disappointed the permanent bans haven't already been handed out.
indeed, it's upsetting that racists are allowed to play this game unchecked. |

Dave Stark
4714
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:28:00 -
[74] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Bloodmyst Ranwar wrote:As harsh as it may sound, scamming is a part of Eve.
However, the major problem I have is where they make fun of his speech impediment. There is no acceptable excuse CCP can give, that should allow this behavior.
This is bullying.
CCP should not tolerate this, and I'm quiet disappointed the permanent bans haven't already been handed out. Permabans for saying something mean? I don't condone taking the mick out of the way someone speaks (unless you're Welsh), nor do I do it (unless you're Welsh), but people like you are the reason a fat guy can get arrested for telling a joke about fat people in England.
sheep shaggers... baaaa. |

Dave Stark
4714
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:33:00 -
[75] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:For me, this is simply beating up on a weaker person. For those that justify how the victim should be "stronger" or "know better", would that same logic work for the small, weak and younger kid that gets pushed down by the larger, stronger, and older one after being led into a situation he can't escape?
There's no question in my mind who is wrong here. I'll be watching for CCP's official response. It's disheartening to see this happen in such a wonderful game and I'd hate to see this behavior continued to be allowed that tarnishes it.
led to a situation he can't escape? escape was 1 damn mouse click away for the ENTIRE duration of that recording. |

Dave Stark
4714
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:36:00 -
[76] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Dave Stark wrote:led to a situation he can't escape? escape was 1 damn mouse click away for the ENTIRE duration of that recording. Implying that the physical difficulty of performing a click has any relevance.
it's relevant in the fact that "a situation he can't escape" is a complete lie. |

Dave Stark
4714
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:42:00 -
[77] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Sephira Galamore wrote:Dave Stark wrote:led to a situation he can't escape? escape was 1 damn mouse click away for the ENTIRE duration of that recording. Implying that the physical difficulty of performing a click has any relevance. it's relevant in the fact that "a situation he can't escape" is a complete lie. Only that you are ignoring the mental factor. Silly analogy: Shooting someone with a gun. Some people just can't do it (in a given situation). Even tho it's no different than "just a click"
not in the slightest. there's a vast difference between he can't escape, and he didn't want to escape. |

Dave Stark
4715
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Quote:not in the slightest. there's a vast difference between he can't escape, and he didn't want to escape. Massve difference between being so invested that he didn't feel that he could escape without losing stuff that he was emotionally invested in. Once that had been stripped a further hour and a half was completely not needed. It was clear he was in distress and yet it carried on. You still haven't answered that issue.
the difference is irrelevant, he could have still left whenever the hell he pleased.
and people are casually ignoring that he's a racist that threatens people, they still haven't accepted that fact. |

Dave Stark
4715
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Avio Yaken wrote:Why are people even siding with this *******? (the scammers)
are people just ignoring that they just went off and did the most **** move imaginable and instead some are saying how the victim should be punished instead
because it seems a third of the player base of eve are sociopaths, and a vocal minority - outright sadists, thats why..... If I was CCP, I would boot E1 & Co. and pass therir IPs to law enforcement.
and would you be banning the racist, too? |

Dave Stark
4715
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:55:00 -
[80] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Dave Stark wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Avio Yaken wrote:Why are people even siding with this *******? (the scammers)
are people just ignoring that they just went off and did the most **** move imaginable and instead some are saying how the victim should be punished instead
because it seems a third of the player base of eve are sociopaths, and a vocal minority - outright sadists, thats why..... If I was CCP, I would boot E1 & Co. and pass therir IPs to law enforcement. and would you be banning the racist, too? Nope. I would apologize to the dude on behalf of EVE community.
so you're fine with racists, but not with scammers.
got it. |
|

Dave Stark
4720
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:56:00 -
[81] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Jayem See wrote:Quote:not in the slightest. there's a vast difference between he can't escape, and he didn't want to escape. Massve difference between being so invested that he didn't feel that he could escape without losing stuff that he was emotionally invested in. Once that had been stripped a further hour and a half was completely not needed. It was clear he was in distress and yet it carried on. You still haven't answered that issue. the difference is irrelevant, he could have still left whenever the hell he pleased. and people are casually ignoring that he's a racist that threatens people, they still haven't accepted that fact. Some people say things they don't mean in the heat of the moment. Whether you judge them for that is one thing. You might be in a rage, drunk or just joking - once you've said it it's done. It doesn't mean that you believe it. Whether you try and dance around it with semantics is irrelevant. The guy had been pushed to his limit and he lost it.
if he can't control his temper, he should have left before it became an issue. |

Dave Stark
4720
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 23:58:00 -
[82] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:So Erotica 1 can keep on bonus rooming it up, just use Eve Voice bro! Insta-ban if he does. 100% certain. Thats why he doesn't. But don't worry. This will gain enough momentum for action to be taken, either way.
haha, i sincerely doubt it.
i sincerely doubt ccp will ban some one for doing something out of game, especially when the "victim" broke more rules (that don't apply because it was out of game) than ero did. |

Dave Stark
4720
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 00:00:00 -
[83] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Zifrian wrote:For me, this is simply beating up on a weaker person. For those that justify how the victim should be "stronger" or "know better", would that same logic work for the small, weak and younger kid that gets pushed down by the larger, stronger, and older one after being led into a situation he can't escape?
There's no question in my mind who is wrong here. I'll be watching for CCP's official response. It's disheartening to see this happen in such a wonderful game and I'd hate to see this behavior continued to be allowed that tarnishes it. led to a situation he can't escape? escape was 1 damn mouse click away for the ENTIRE duration of that recording. You can pick away at everything I typed all you want, the central issue here is that you (and others) are condoning actions by someone that picked on a weaker person by judging the victim for their behavior, which you clearly would not do. It seems there is no shortage of people in the world these days that have an opinion on how someone else should live their life. Be it how you do your job, how you drive your car to work, what you post on the internet, or how you play a video game. These same people who know all the "right" and "wrong" way to do things are just as human as everyone else and they all have some weakness that could be exploited. Sometimes those weaknesses get harmlessly exploited and most of us laugh it off. However, in this case, it is crystal clear that this crossed the line of truly unacceptable behavior in society. Within our gaming world, I think that matters a great deal. I hope CCP agrees.
i don't believe i've condoned it once.
it wasn't within our gaming world at all, it was on teamspeak not in eve.
do you even understand what's going on here? |

Dave Stark
4720
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 00:01:00 -
[84] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Tancred Xero wrote:EI Digin wrote:If you don't like what he did, why don't you do something about it instead of crying on the forums trying to get someone else to do something?
Dispensing your own justice is what this game is all about. You have yourself a valid cause. Do something about it. The guy literally never undocks. There is nothing TO do about it; the game prevents it. He has a killboard so he literally does undock. He's in an alliance that is almost constantly at war. Maybe you should convenience him to undock in something shiney.
i hear if you invite him on to teamspeak, he will undock. |

Dave Stark
4720
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 00:04:00 -
[85] - Quote
Iudicium Vastus wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
the difference is irrelevant, he could have still left whenever the hell he pleased.
and people are casually ignoring that he's a racist that threatens people, they still haven't accepted that fact.
Maybe because some of us have a better grasp of logic and human reasoning. Even for deadly serious real life matters, in courts things like Duress, Extenuating Circumstances, and even Diminished Capacity exist. Since someone pushed by force, emotions, or circumstance has much less burden of responsibility than another doing the same under orderly and perfect conditions. It can mean the difference between manslaughter convictions or 1st degree. Also, 'simply leaving' is much the same thing I'm sure battered women hear all the time. "why don't you just leave him?" Sometimes people are emotionally invested in various matters, that even if taking any physical action to leave the situation is completely possible, the will to is completely absent. Anyone else not taking those matters into consideration are just actively and intentionally looking for reasons not to hold the instigator(s) with any responsibility of the scenario.
yeah trivialising domestic abuse to try and draw parallels that don't exist just infuriate me.
quite frankly at this time of night i think it's a good time to get some sleep than deal with people like yourself who irk me to no end by trivialising domestic abuse to incorrectly try and prove a point they've wildly missed.
leaving a bonus room with one mouse click doesn't have the same repercussions as an abused spouse trying to separate themselves from a partner, i hope you never have to find out how true that is. you repulse me. |

Dave Stark
4747
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 17:50:00 -
[86] - Quote
160 pages, **** me.
make that 161 between opening my browser, and putting my shirt on... |

Dave Stark
4747
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 17:51:00 -
[87] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:The real belligerent here is Ripard Teg.
you mean starting a witch hunt via your blog isn't an acceptable thing to do? |

Dave Stark
4748
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 17:59:00 -
[88] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:The real belligerent here is Ripard Teg. The guy who doesn't defend his blog in its own threadnaught.
because he knows exactly what he was doing, inciting a witch hunt. hats off to him, it has worked fantastically. to the point where they're overlooking racial slurs and real life threats because "erotica is a bad man, because he tortured a poor defenceless victim".
clearly ripard has been taking spin lessons from the CFC, it's scary how well his little campaign is working. |

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:18:00 -
[89] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:David Kir wrote:
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
Got any evidence for that? Personally I joined EVE because of its freedom to scam, loot and pillage.
as did i, i was looking for the very reverse of the themepark WoW had devolved in to over it's duration. |

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:23:00 -
[90] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:baltec1 wrote:David Kir wrote:
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
Got any evidence for that? Personally I joined EVE because of its freedom to scam, loot and pillage. I know there's no EULA/ToS against looting and pillaging people's out-of-game homes, but still...
yes there is, it's called the law. |
|

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:26:00 -
[91] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:So really, you think CCP cares?
of course they care. do they care enough to bend to the pressure of whiners and carebears? depends where they see their future revenue coming from, i guess. |

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:30:00 -
[92] - Quote
David Kir wrote:baltec1 wrote:David Kir wrote:
I don't think so.
But don't care about that. I care about the fact that people like E1 actively drive away new players.
Got any evidence for that? Personally I joined EVE because of its freedom to scam, loot and pillage. I joined EVE because of the danger, too. But that's irrelevant. We aren't talking about "scamming, looting and pillaging". We aren't talking about "da rulez", either. We're talking about unethical behaviour, and the reputation deriving from it.
except unethical behavior is what brought us here.
lies, deceit, theft, betrayal. the myriad of morally bankrupt shenanigans are what made this game so appealing to many people. |

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:31:00 -
[93] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Its very simple guys.
EVE Online has no place for real-life pedophiles, rapists, online predators, pimps, terrorists, and drug dealers.
E1 and friends fall somewhere along that axis and have to go.
Very simple.
actually, eve online has a place for everyone from all walks of life provided they don't break the tos/eula while playing the game.
your prejudices towards certain demographics are irrelevant. |

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:34:00 -
[94] - Quote
David Kir wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
except unethical behavior is what brought us here.
lies, deceit, theft, betrayal. the myriad of morally bankrupt shenanigans are what made this game so appealing to many people.
There are various degrees of unethical behaviour.
no. something is either ethical, or it isn't. |

Dave Stark
4753
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 18:36:00 -
[95] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Xuixien wrote:So really, you think CCP cares? of course they care. do they care enough to bend to the pressure of whiners and carebears? depends where they see their future revenue coming from, i guess. I guess if CCP wants to go the way of all the other themepark MMOs, they'll bend to that pressure.
part of me wouldn't blame them for bending. WoW at it's peak had 10m subscribers. every man has their price, question is... is 10m subscribers enough to pay hilmar's price? |

Dave Stark
4769
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 18:59:00 -
[96] - Quote
Korhaka Mirunas wrote:This is becoming a circlejerk of one side saying to ban, another saying to leave it alone.
becoming? where have you been the last 2 days? |

Dave Stark
4774
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 19:06:00 -
[97] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Xuixien wrote:Kristalll wrote:So it's exactly like if I point you and ask you to sing a song on TS3 or a I kill you, right? Yes it's exactly like that, because they have your virtual spaceship. False. See: "No, its like we will torture you until you leave the Bonus Room, and we win."
pretty sure we've established that it wasn't torture. |

Dave Stark
4774
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 19:09:00 -
[98] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:pretty sure we've established that it wasn't torture. Have you read the post linked in my sig? I encourage you to do so.
linking to yourself as some kind of proof, surprised you haven't been in a bonus room yourself. |

Dave Stark
4774
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 19:12:00 -
[99] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:H aVo K wrote:It's not torture. Have you read the post linked in my sig? I would encourage you to do so.
encourage all you want, it still wasn't torture. |

Dave Stark
4776
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 19:41:00 -
[100] - Quote
Kristalll wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote:The signs of a psychopath according to phsychologytoday.com are: 1: Uncaring - being callous, a lack of empathy2: "lack of emotion, especially the social emotions, such as shame, guilt, and embarrassment" 3: Irresponsibility, including showing GÇ£ blame externalization", such as blaming the victim for one's abusive actions 4: Overconfidence: "The PCL describes sociopaths as possessing a ' grandiose sense of self worth.'" Sounds quite a bit like the behaviors in the recording that started this firestorm. Source: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mindmelding/201301/what-is-psychopath-0(Relax, I didn't cite Wikipedia.) Interesting. Recently I actually had people from BU, Miner Bumping, and the Bonus Room fill out a questionnaire and take a Psychopathy Survey created by Professionals in the field of Psychological Disorders. The results were interesting, but not particularly spectacular. Seems EVE Pirates aren't THAT much more psychopathic than 'normal' people.
completely unsurprising. |
|

Dave Stark
4778
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 19:50:00 -
[101] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote: ofc that sounds completely normal! because a special snowflake said it!
objection! evidence obtained under torture. |

Dave Stark
4779
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 20:24:00 -
[102] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Then what is the point of the unwinnable game?
you've never been to a carnival have you? |

Dave Stark
4779
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 20:41:00 -
[103] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:you've never been to a carnival have you? Aaah! Nice try at non-sequitor! I'll bite. They already have his assets before the Bonus Room begins. There is not one single further space cent to be squeezed out of him during the Bonus Room. So I ask again: What is the point of the unwinnable game?
and the guy at the carnival has my money before i play his game.
i ask you again, have you ever been to the carnival? |

Dave Stark
4780
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 20:46:00 -
[104] - Quote
Vilar Diin wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:you've never been to a carnival have you? Aaah! Nice try at non-sequitor! I'll bite. They already have his assets before the Bonus Room begins. There is not one single further space cent to be squeezed out of him during the Bonus Room. So I ask again: What is the point of the unwinnable game? and the guy at the carnival has my money before i play his game. i ask you again, have you ever been to the carnival? Oh you are a carnival kind of guy? Do you like gladiator movies by chance? 
the russel crow film? |

Dave Stark
4780
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 20:53:00 -
[105] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kristalll wrote:So if a manager at mcdonalds molests a child, mcdonalds is held responsible as a molester-based business? Yes, if they knew he was molesting kids.
confirming macdonalds best seller is underage children. |

Dave Stark
4780
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 20:55:00 -
[106] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:confirming macdonalds best seller is underage children. They sell underage children?!?!
you just siad they were a child molesting business. |

Dave Stark
4784
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:00:00 -
[107] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Just to inject some factual information:
1) CCP have taken notice of the the issue. 2) So have the CSM. 3) I personally I am very content with the direction the resultant discussion took. All my concerns were dealt with, and the CSM has a unified position.
excellent, now everyone can get on with ignoring the whole issue like they have been for the months it has been going on. |

Dave Stark
4784
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:02:00 -
[108] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just to inject some factual information:
1) CCP have taken notice of the the issue. 2) So have the CSM. 3) I personally I am very content with the direction the resultant discussion took. All my concerns were dealt with, and the CSM has a unified position.
can we get a blue tag to weigh in on the matter?
we've had two. don't break the forum rules is the official stance. |

Dave Stark
4784
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:04:00 -
[109] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just to inject some factual information:
1) CCP have taken notice of the the issue. 2) So have the CSM. 3) I personally I am very content with the direction the resultant discussion took. All my concerns were dealt with, and the CSM has a unified position.
excellent, now everyone can get on with ignoring the whole issue like they have been for the months it has been going on. Yeah. The issue they were ignoring for months until Erotica 1's life was threatened by a mentally unstable client. ripard used his blog to spark a witch hunt. Somehow this means Erotica 1 is in the wrong.
ftfy. |

Dave Stark
4791
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:07:00 -
[110] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
Yeah. The issue they were ignoring for months until Erotica 1's life was threatened by a mentally unstable client. ripard used his blog to spark a witch hunt.
Somehow this means Erotica 1 is in the wrong.
ftfy. i dont see this ending well for him[/quote]
nothing will happen to erotica, the racist who's name i still can't remember how to spell, or ripard.
the official stance will be "care is lower than a hooker's undergarments" and swept under the carpet. |
|

Dave Stark
4791
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:08:00 -
[111] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Desivo Delta Visseroff wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just to inject some factual information:
1) CCP have taken notice of the the issue. 2) So have the CSM. 3) I personally I am very content with the direction the resultant discussion took. All my concerns were dealt with, and the CSM has a unified position.
Great! Time to lock this thread. Agreed, its disintigrating into a typical General Discussion thread.
a topic in general discussion turning in to a topic in general discussion?
shocker. |

Dave Stark
4791
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:09:00 -
[112] - Quote
arabella blood wrote:Malcanis wrote:Xuixien wrote:Malcanis wrote:Just to inject some factual information:
1) CCP have taken notice of the the issue. 2) So have the CSM. 3) I personally I am very content with the direction the resultant discussion took. All my concerns were dealt with, and the CSM has a unified position.
So nothing will be done to Erotica 1 then, except maybe a slap on the wrist and possibly some revision of the EULA. You could make that interpretation Can you stop playing in codes and with a politicians tounge??
he basically said you're free to read whatever he wrote, and jump to whatever wild conclusion you want to. |

Dave Stark
4791
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:11:00 -
[113] - Quote
you mean a system where people who file baseless reports have a detrimental effect on your game, meaning the butthurt miner you gank with the most accounts can ruin your game because he doesn't agree with how you play eve?
doesn't sound open to abuse at all. |

Dave Stark
4791
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:13:00 -
[114] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Dave Stark wrote:you mean a system where people who file baseless reports have a detrimental effect on your game, meaning the butthurt miner you gank with the most accounts can ruin your game because he doesn't agree with how you play eve? doesn't sound open to abuse at all. Already exists in form of Report Bot button. That one isnt abused at all.
remind me, which innocent player was banned for botting after being reported as a bot. |

Dave Stark
4791
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:13:00 -
[115] - Quote
arabella blood wrote:Dave Stark wrote:he basically said you're free to read whatever he wrote, and jump to whatever wild conclusion you want to. Really? thx captain obvious.
any time. |

Dave Stark
4792
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:22:00 -
[116] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Kristalll wrote:Don't lie. You and I both know these scams are targeted at bored bittervets. You still get all his assets though, if they are stupid/dumb enough to comply. And I applaud you for that. Gf. But why the whole Bonus Room thing thereafter?
because if they're not going to get a bonus room, why would they give you their stuff? |

Dave Stark
4792
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:23:00 -
[117] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Batelle wrote:Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports") Nothing is impossible. A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.
have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?
there are things that are impossible, that is one of them. |

Dave Stark
4792
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:25:00 -
[118] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Dave Stark wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Batelle wrote:Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports") Nothing is impossible. A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic. have you ever tried slamming a revolving door? there are things that are impossible, that is one of them. OK. whatever you say Mr. Troll.
you submitted that nothing is impossible.
it is impossible to slam a revolving door.
explain to me how that's trolling.
thinking before you speak is a great way not to embarrass yourself, just for future reference. |

Dave Stark
4794
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:33:00 -
[119] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:because if they're not going to get a bonus room, why would they give you their stuff? Why go to a bonus room after they give you their stuff?
so they can win it back, plus a bonus. clue is in the name.
do you even understand the topic we're discussing here? you're showing a staggering lack of clue about the topic. |

Dave Stark
4794
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:34:00 -
[120] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?
there are things that are impossible, that is one of them. Proof is possible
i don't see a revolving door being slammed. |
|

Dave Stark
4794
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:35:00 -
[121] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:so they can win it back, plus a bonus. clue is in the name. And how exactly do they win it back?
by completing the bonus room. |

Dave Stark
4797
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:37:00 -
[122] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:HTFU? Why? Why do we have to close our eyes and allow the game to get worse?
why does not bending to whiners make the game worse? |

Dave Stark
4797
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:38:00 -
[123] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:by completing the bonus room. And how do they complete the bonus room?
why are you asking me? i don't run bonus rooms. |

Dave Stark
4797
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:39:00 -
[124] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Most people seem to be differentiating between the scam and the theatre afterward, pointing to the theater as the over the top humiliation they find objectionable.
If you separate the scam itself from everything-that-happens-after-in-the-bonus-room, A. what does it have to do with EVE/CCP and B. How is it any different than a prank call by a radio show?
because he was tortured
have none of you read the memo? |

Dave Stark
4797
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:42:00 -
[125] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:By this point my head is spinning Perhaps because you forgot to wear your protective tinfoil.
you should share yours, you seem to have an abundance of it. |

Dave Stark
4797
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:43:00 -
[126] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Dave Stark wrote:by completing the bonus room. And how do they complete the bonus room? why are you asking me? i don't run bonus rooms. Cos nobody seems to be able to answer it.
you mean, because nobody here is erotica 1? why don't you ask him, rather than random people. |

Dave Stark
4798
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:48:00 -
[127] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:HTFU? Why? Why do we have to close our eyes and allow the game to get worse? why does not bending to whiners make the game worse? EVE has a mountain to climb, that's why. At the top of that mountain is Kandy Land. Players will be awarded points for completing the same quest every day for a week, and these points will be used to buy indestructible, account bound Epic Officer Modules.
you mean like the formerly popular game that has been hemorrhaging players recently due to the puddle of liquid excrement the developers put it in chasing money instead of quality content?
if ccp want to sacrifice 10 years of constant growth and stable income for a trip up candy mountain and hard fall off cliff at the top, fair play to them. they'll probably have enough cash by the time they run off the cliff to land on their own private island. |

Dave Stark
4798
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:53:00 -
[128] - Quote
Sapheni wrote:Obviously it would need something to prevent abuse, but the concept is good. In EVE players with a red card could lose forum posting and local posting 'privileges'. No more forum trolls and no more scammers in Jita. Self regulation 4tw.
best way to prevent abuse, don't add glaringly abusable systems to the game. see FW. |

Dave Stark
4801
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:56:00 -
[129] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:HTFU? Why? Why do we have to close our eyes and allow the game to get worse? why does not bending to whiners make the game worse? It doesn't, that's why I think they may take action against E1 despite the: "sky is falling" "pack your **** the game is over if we admit that E1 acted inappropriately" "care bears are winning" "we are hard guys so our whining isn't REALLY whining" "oh noes, I will never gank again" handwringing histrionics that you, your 10 friends and all of their alts have been doing over 300+ pages. TL/DR stop whining I can't drink your tears fast enough
sense, make some. |

Dave Stark
4801
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:57:00 -
[130] - Quote
Pok Nibin wrote:McDonald's is liable as they implicitly guarantee a safe environment for children if they allow children in as customers. This includes the area of the parking lot. If McDonald's is aware the crime is occurring but doesn't report, or prevent it, then they are complicit in the crime as an accessory before and after the fact.
teamspeak better be worried for providing an environment for torture to take place, then. |
|

Dave Stark
4801
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:59:00 -
[131] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Let us work to FIX what is broken and keep climbing.
so CCP are finally getting around to dealing with pos code?
excellent. |

Dave Stark
4801
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:02:00 -
[132] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Danalee wrote:You should read between the lines, they are going to cut the dead weight that sokhar the racist is. Good riddance! D.  Maybe they will...he shouldn't have said those things. I'm not here to make excuses for poor behavior unlike yourself who will go to the mat for a creepy individual who asks his contestants to write his name in peanut butter on themselves and send him the pics
what's wrong with asking people to write their name in peanut butter on themselves and send proof? |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:06:00 -
[133] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Drone 16 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:HTFU? Why? Why do we have to close our eyes and allow the game to get worse? why does not bending to whiners make the game worse? It doesn't, that's why I think they may take action against E1 despite the: "sky is falling" "pack your **** the game is over if we admit that E1 acted inappropriately" "care bears are winning" "we are hard guys so our whining isn't REALLY whining" "oh noes, I will never gank again" handwringing histrionics that you, your 10 friends and all of their alts have been doing over 300+ pages. TL/DR stop whining I can't drink your tears fast enough sense, make some. Your tears are so delicious. I hope that clarifies things for you. I may have some crayons lying about or would you prefer I wrote it in peanut butter so you and E1 can read it together.
how would you know? i'm not crying. i asked a question, that was all.
reading isn't your forte is it? |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:07:00 -
[134] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Xuixien wrote: If I asked you to look up the word "derogatory", would that be crossing the line?
Nope, it would be appropriate, I have a migraine today and language skills are the first to go (along with sight in my right eye) Derogatory is far too soft a term for what I meant. thank you, now what word was I trying for? m
bird.
bird is the word. |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:09:00 -
[135] - Quote
Drone 16 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Drone 16 wrote:Danalee wrote:You should read between the lines, they are going to cut the dead weight that sokhar the racist is. Good riddance! D.  Maybe they will...he shouldn't have said those things. I'm not here to make excuses for poor behavior unlike yourself who will go to the mat for a creepy individual who asks his contestants to write his name in peanut butter on themselves and send him the pics what's wrong with asking people to write their name in peanut butter on themselves and send proof? And there we have it finally. Peas in a pod. You just said all that needs hearing. Done with you. Thanks again, they were delicious!
you keep mistaking question marks for tears.
an education would be most beneficial for you, you clearly aren't burdened with an overabundance of it. you seem to be unable to comprehend what a question is. |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:10:00 -
[136] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Damn it Dave.
Now that song is going through my aching head.
well played
m
:) |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:15:00 -
[137] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Dave Stark wrote: you keep mistaking question marks for tears.
an education would be most beneficial for you, you clearly aren't burdened with an overabundance of it. you seem to be unable to comprehend what a question is.
He didn't know the difference between "dribble" and "spread", either. I think he should look those words up.
he doesn't seem to understand how words work, as a whole. |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:21:00 -
[138] - Quote
Vance Armistice wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Drone 16 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Drone 16 wrote:
Maybe they will...he shouldn't have said those things. I'm not here to make excuses for poor behavior unlike yourself who will go to the mat for a creepy individual who asks his contestants to write his name in peanut butter on themselves and send him the pics
what's wrong with asking people to write their name in peanut butter on themselves and send proof? And there we have it finally. Peas in a pod. You just said all that needs hearing. Done with you. Thanks again, they were delicious! you keep mistaking question marks for tears. an education would be most beneficial for you, you clearly aren't burdened with an overabundance of it. you seem to be unable to comprehend what a question is. Bro, not for nothing but if you need that question answered in the context of all that has come out about that guy then you have at least 99 problems and Eve isn't 1 of them so go get checked out. And to be fair, I have been watching this thread from page 1, not saying much just watching the carnage, you have been one of the most prolific whiners in here so maybe you haven't been crying, but you have seemed on the verge at times. 
considering i haven't whined about anything related to this topic, you're going to give me a quote to work with rather than you screaming "YES YOU ARE" |

Dave Stark
4802
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:22:00 -
[139] - Quote
Dani Dusette wrote:Xuixien is still my favorite pixellated badgirl though.
Kinda.
Also this thread is beginning to remind me of Season 2, Episode 1 of Vikings.
cared about by nobody? |

Dave Stark
4804
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 22:43:00 -
[140] - Quote
Vance Armistice wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
whingey, whine
.
Bro, not for nothing but if you need that question answered in the context of all that has come out about that guy then you have at least 99 problems and Eve isn't 1 of them so go get checked out. And to be fair, I have been watching this thread from page 1, not saying much just watching the carnage, you have been one of the most prolific whiners in here so maybe you haven't been crying, but you have seemed on the verge at times. 
considering i haven't whined about anything related to this topic, you're going to give me a quote to work with rather than you screaming "YES YOU ARE"[/quote]
Oh, I wasn't really looking for anything from you as far as analysis, I just wanted to validate the other guys observations. I loved how he dunked you, repeatedly.
But do see someone about your lack of a moral compass. Identifying with some of the lowest common denominators in this thread is not the best indication of being well-adjusted.
Have to run! Toodles o/
[/quote]
asking for evidence of baseless claims doesn't validate anything, much less him dunking me.
do both of you have issue with the written word? |
|
|
|
|